Skip to main content

Optimal Rose (25 players)

25/25
Red (presumably referring to a color or an object)PlayerTeamQuestionFederal Ministry (presumably referring to the German Federal Ministry)RiskAlternative
P Lorenzo MontipoVerona65.80 Basso
P Marco SilvestriUdinese85.90 Basso
P David De GeaFiorentina136.00 Basso
D Elseid HysajLazio55.80 Medio
D Eric GarciaGirona/Milan75.90 Basso
D Gianluca ManciniRoma86.00 Basso
D Nikola MilenkovicFiorentina96.10 Basso
D DaniloJuventus86.00 Medio
D Federico GattiJuventus106.20 Basso
D Amir RrahmaniNapoli106.20 Basso
D Lewis DunkBrighton/Genoa106.10 Basso
C Marcelo BrozovicAl Nassr86.00 Medio
C Marten De RoonAtalanta106.20 Basso
C Adrien RabiotMarsiglia106.30 Medio
C Sandro TonaliNewcastle146.80 Basso
C Lorenzo PellegriniRoma146.50 Medio
C Ederson PassiniAtalanta166.50 Basso
C Mattia ZaccagniLazio186.80 Basso
C Scott McTominayNapoli247.40 Basso
A Taty CastellanosLazio146.80 Basso
A Álvaro MorataMilan126.50 Medio
A Mateo ReteguiAtalanta247.80 Basso
A Romelu LukakuNapoli227.30 Medio
A Albert GudmundssonFiorentina227.00 Medio
A Paulo DybalaRoma207.20 Alto

Role-based distribution

PPortiere3
  • Lorenzo Montipo6M
  • Marco Silvestri8M
  • David De Gea13M
DDifensore8
  • Elseid Hysaj5M
  • Eric Garcia7M
  • Gianluca Mancini8M
  • Nikola Milenkovic9M
  • Danilo8M
  • Federico Gatti10M
  • Amir Rrahmani10M
  • Lewis Dunk10M
CCentrocampista8
  • Marcelo Brozovic8M
  • Marten De Roon10M
  • Adrien Rabiot10M
  • Sandro Tonali14M
  • Lorenzo Pellegrini14M
  • Ederson Passini16M
  • Mattia Zaccagni18M
  • Scott McTominay24M
AAttaccante6
  • Taty Castellanos14M
  • Álvaro Morata12M
  • Mateo Retegui24M
  • Romelu Lukaku22M
  • Albert Gudmundsson22M
  • Paulo Dybala20M

Projected figures based on projections for the years 2025-26. Official quotes vary at Fantasy Calcio auction. Use this tool as a starting point for your strategy.

Come utilizzare

Imposta il budget

Il budget standard Fantacalcio è €500 fantamilioni. Puoi abbassarlo per simulare aste con meno risorse. Il tool distribuisce il budget tra i 25 slot in modo ottimale.

Scegli la formula di scoring

Classic: voto standard + bonus/malus semplici. Mantra: sistema multi-ruolo con specializzazioni (Por, Dc, Dd, Ds, B, E, M, C, W, T, A, Pc). La scelta influenza la rilevanza dei giocatori polivalenti.

Seleziona la formazione preferita

La formazione determina i titolari (11 giocatori). Le riserve (14) vengono selezionate per massimizzare la copertura in caso di assenze. Una rosa con più attaccanti favorisce bonus gol.

Scegli il profilo di rischio

Conservativo: privilegia affidabilità e presenze certe. Bilanciato: mix equilibrato. Aggressivo: punta su giocatori ad alto potenziale offensivo anche se meno stabili.

Domande frequenti

How does the optimization algorithm work?

The tool uses a greedy approach with backtracking. It first calculates a composite score for each player (projected fantasy value, reliability, injury risk, potential) then orders by efficiency (score/price) and fills the 25 slots per role: 3P + 8D + 8C + 6A. If budget is insufficient at the end positions, it activates backtracking to select the most cost-effective options.

What does "alternative score" mean?

For each player on the roster, the tool calculates top 3 swap candidates - players of the same role not selected with the highest composite score. Clicking "Swap" shows who could replace them.

Are player data up-to-date?

Projections are based on estimated 2025/26 data. Official quotes vary annually with the Fantasy Football auction. Use this tool as a starting point for your strategy, not as a definitive source of quotes.

What is the difference between Classic and Mantra?

In Classic, each player has a fixed role (P/D/C/A). In Mantra, each player has multiple roles (e.g. Ds can play as Ds or E). Mantra values versatility; a defender who covers both the defensive and midfield roles is more useful in 5-man center back formations.

Is the profile "aggressive" recommended?

Aggressive profile focuses on high potential and elevated fantasy projections, accepting more variability and injury risk. Recommended for those seeking an offensive team with a higher chance of winning the fantasy championship. The conservative approach is preferred by those focusing on consistency.